Mallikarjun Kharge demands Parliament session over govt mislead on jets, Trump ceasefire claim

Following CDS Anil Chauhan's rare admission of Indian fighter jet losses in the April 2025 India-Pakistan conflict, Congress leader Mallikarjun Kharge has escalated pressure on the Modi government, demanding a special parliamentary session and an independent review. Kharge also condemned US President Trump's ceasefire announcement as undermining the 1972 Shimla Agreement, intensifying political scrutiny over the conflict's handling.

Sources:
Deccan HeraldIndianexpressIndiatoday+3
Updated 1h ago
Tab background
Sources: Deccan HeraldIndiatodayIndianexpress+2
Congress leader Mallikarjun Kharge has demanded a special session of Parliament to address what he calls government misinformation regarding fighter jet losses during the recent India-Pakistan conflict.

"The fact that our fighter aircraft were downed is something the Government must stop denying," said Telangana minister Uttam Kumar Reddy, echoing Kharge's call for transparency.

The Chief of Defence Staff (CDS), General Anil Chauhan, officially acknowledged initial losses in the air but highlighted that India adapted tactics and carried out precision strikes deep inside Pakistan.

"We rectified tactics and then went back to hit air bases deep inside Pakistan, penetrated all their air defences with impunity," Chauhan told Reuters.

Kharge also criticized US President Donald Trump's tweet announcing the ceasefire before official diplomatic communication, calling it a "direct affront to the 1972 Shimla Agreement," which prohibits third-party interference in Kashmir.

"Why did the US President first announce the ceasefire through a tweet, and hours later DGMO Pakistan called up his Indian counterpart, and the ceasefire was agreed upon?" questioned Reddy.

Kharge urged the formation of an independent expert committee to conduct a comprehensive review of defence preparedness, similar to the Kargil Review Committee.

The controversy follows India's claim of killing over 100 terrorists in precision strikes on terror camps in Pakistan, which Pakistan denies, alleging civilian casualties.

The conflict was triggered by a deadly attack in Pahalgam, Kashmir, killing 26 people, mostly tourists.

The BJP has criticized Congress for allegedly lowering the morale of Indian armed forces by questioning aircraft losses, while Congress insists on transparency and accountability.

This demand for a parliamentary session underscores the political tension surrounding the handling and communication of sensitive defence operations and diplomatic engagements.
Sources: Indiatoday
Congress leader Mallikarjun Kharge demands a special Parliament session to address government misinformation on fighter jet losses during recent India-Pakistan hostilities and criticizes US President Trump's ceasefire claim, calling for an independent defence review and questioning the diplomatic sequence of the ceasefire announcement.
Section 1 background
The Headline

CDS admits jet losses; Kharge demands Parliament session

The Congress demands a Comprehensive Review of Defence Preparedness by an independent expert committee, on the lines of the Kargil Review Committee.
Mallikarjun Kharge
Congress president
Indiatoday
Key Facts
  • CDS Anil Chauhan officially acknowledged initial Indian fighter jet losses during the recent hostilities with Pakistan without specifying numbers.IndianexpressIndiatoday
  • India changed tactics after suffering air losses on the first day and subsequently gained a decisive advantage by hitting air bases deep inside Pakistan with precision strikes.AljazeeraIndianexpress
  • Congress demands clarity from the government on the number of fighter jets lost and calls for a special Parliament session and an independent review committee to assess defence preparedness.2Indiatoday
  • Mallikarjun Kharge accused the government of misleading the nation on fighter jet losses and challenged US President Donald Trump's ceasefire announcement as a violation of the 1972 Shimla Agreement.Indiatoday
Key Stats at a Glance
Official admission of fighter jets downed in combat
1 number

Related Videos

India says tactics change worked well in Pakistan conflict | REUTERS
IndiaPakistanIndian ArmyIndia Pakistan conflictKashmir
US Stopped Nuclear War: Trump Repeats Claims On India-Pak Ceasefire | Subscribe to Firstpost | N18G
TrumpIndia-Pakistanceasefirenuclear warFirstpost
Trump's Claims On Stopping A Potential War Between India And Pakistan | N18G
TrumpIndiaPakistannuclear wartrade deal
India’s Military Confirms For The First Time That It Lost An Unspecified Number Of Fighter Jets
Indiamilitaryfighter jetsPakistanconflict
Section 2 background
Background Context

Conflict origins, claims, and political criticism

Hope those who asked questions won't be called anti-nationals anymore: Pawan Khera on CDS acknowledging aircraft losses in recent hostilities with Pakistan.
Pawan Khera
Congress leader
Deccan Herald
Revanth Reddy's statements are bizarre and irresponsible behaviour unbecoming of a state leader.
NV Subash
BJP state chief spokesperson
1
Key Facts
  • Fighting was triggered by an attack in Pahalgam on April 22, 2025, which killed 26 people, mostly tourists.Aljazeera
  • India claimed precision strikes killed over 100 terrorists in Pakistan, while Pakistan denied this and claimed more than 30 civilians were killed in the Indian attacks.Aljazeera
  • BJP criticized Congress and Telangana minister Revanth Reddy for questioning the government narrative and alleged that such questioning lowers the morale of Indian armed forces.Deccan Herald2
  • Telangana minister Revanth Reddy questioned the government's narrative on fighter jet losses and the diplomatic sequence of the ceasefire, especially the role of US President Donald Trump.22
Key Stats at a Glance
Terrorists killed in Indian precision strikes
100 number
Aljazeera
Pakistani civilians killed in Indian attacks
30 number
Aljazeera
People killed in Pahalgam attack
26 number
Aljazeera
Date of Pahalgam attack
22 April 2025
Aljazeera
Article not found
CuriousCats.ai

Article

Source Citations