Sources: 
Selectors for Team India's England tour have come under scrutiny for overlooking seasoned batsman Ajinkya Rahane, raising questions about the team's batting order strategy.
Cricket legend Donald Bradman famously advocated for the best batsman to occupy the No. 3 position, a spot historically pivotal for India's success. "A look at the history of Indian cricket will show that the team has done well whenever there was a top-quality batsman at this position," experts note.
Currently, the consensus among analysts and media suggests that Shubman Gill is likely to bat at No. 4, with Sudarshan taking the crucial one-drop spot. This arrangement has fueled debate on whether selectors missed a strategic opportunity by excluding Rahane, known for his reliability and experience.
"This brings one to the question as to whether the selectors missed a trick or two by refusing to consider Ajinkya Rahane for this series," commentators argue.
The decision has sparked discussions on balancing youth and experience in the lineup, especially given the challenging English conditions. Rahane's omission could impact the team's stability in the middle order, a factor that selectors will need to address moving forward.
As Team India prepares for the tour, the spotlight remains on the selectors' choices and their implications for the squad's performance.
Sources: Selectors face criticism for excluding Ajinkya Rahane from Team India's England tour lineup, sparking debate over batting order strategy. Experts highlight the historical success of a strong No. 3 batsman, questioning if Rahane's omission was a missed opportunity amid discussions on Shubman Gill and Sudarshan's roles.
