IPL 2025 pace duo Hazlewood and Bumrah dominate with 39 wickets: what’s next?

IPL 2025 showcased exceptional individual brilliance, with Hazlewood and Bumrah’s 39 wickets highlighting the tournament’s intense pace battle. This report dives into how their contrasting styles shaped the final outcomes and what it means for future IPL strategies.

Sources:
OneCricket
Updated 3h ago
Tab background
Sources: OneCricket
The Indian Premier League 2025 concluded with a remarkable display from the pace bowling duo Josh Hazlewood and Jasprit Bumrah, who together claimed 39 wickets.

Their partnership was defined by contrasting yet complementary skills: Hazlewood brought aggression upfront, while Bumrah excelled in the death overs, controlling the game's final phases.

"The pace duo combines 39 wickets with complementary skills—Hazlewood's aggression and Bumrah's death-over mastery," highlighted one report.

This combination proved crucial in shaping match outcomes, with Hazlewood's attacking style putting early pressure on batsmen and Bumrah's precision in the closing overs restricting scoring opportunities.

Their performances not only contributed significantly to their teams but also set a high benchmark for pace bowling in the IPL.

Looking ahead, cricket analysts anticipate that this duo will continue to be a formidable force in upcoming seasons, potentially influencing team strategies and player selections.

The IPL 2025 also witnessed other standout performances, including a top run-scorer with 759 runs at a 156.17 strike rate and a middle-order batsman scoring 717 runs at a 65.10 average, underscoring the tournament's competitive nature.

However, it was the Hazlewood-Bumrah pace partnership that captured attention for its balance of aggression and tactical mastery, making them key players to watch in the future.
Sources: OneCricket
In IPL 2025, pace duo Josh Hazlewood and Jasprit Bumrah dominated with a combined 39 wickets, showcasing Hazlewood's aggression and Bumrah's death-over mastery. Their complementary skills were pivotal in the tournament, marking a significant impact on their teams' performances and raising expectations for future seasons.
Section 1 background
The pace duo combines 39 wickets with complementary skills—Hazlewood's aggression and Bumrah's death-over mastery.
Cricket Analyst
OneCricket
Key Facts
  • IPL 2025 concluded with a first-time champion team emerging, marking a historic moment in the tournament's history.OneCricket
  • The opening batsman led the tournament with 759 runs at a 156.17 strike rate, maintaining an impressive 50.6 runs per match consistency.OneCricket
  • Surya Kumar Yadav excelled in the middle order with 717 runs, a 65.10 average, and a 204.8 death-over strike rate, also showcasing strong captaincy credentials.OneCricket
  • A finishing specialist scored 252 runs at a 182.61 strike rate, with 75.4% of his runs coming in death overs (190 out of 252), highlighting his role in crucial moments.OneCricket
  • The pace bowling duo of Hazlewood and Bumrah dominated with a combined 39 wickets, blending Hazlewood's aggression with Bumrah's expertise in death-over bowling.OneCricket
Key Stats at a Glance
First-time champion team in IPL 2025
1st
OneCricket
Runs scored by opening batsman
759 runs
OneCricket
Strike rate of opening batsman
156.17%
OneCricket
Runs per match by opening batsman
50.6 runs
OneCricket
Runs scored by Surya Kumar Yadav
717 runs
OneCricket
Batting average of Surya Kumar Yadav
65.10 runs
OneCricket
Death-over strike rate of Surya Kumar Yadav
204.8%
OneCricket
Runs scored by finishing specialist
252 runs
OneCricket
Strike rate of finishing specialist
182.61%
OneCricket
Percentage of runs in death overs by finishing specialist
75.4%
OneCricket
Runs in death overs by finishing specialist
190 runs
OneCricket
Combined wickets by Hazlewood and Bumrah
39 wickets
OneCricket

Related Videos

RCB ARE THE CHAMPIONS! 🏆 IPL2025
RCBChampionsIPLIndian Premier Leaguecricket
Rajat Patidar’s captaincy has been huge for RCB 🏆 IPL2025 TimeOut
Rajat PatidarRCBIPLIndian Premier Leaguecricket
Article not found
CuriousCats.ai

Article

Source Citations