US charges American citizen for wiping his phone at the border
Sam TunickMarlon Kautz

US charges American citizen for wiping his phone at the border

US citizen Sam Tunick faces charges for allegedly wiping his phone at Atlanta's Hartsfield-Jackson airport while being questioned about child exploitation images. His defense claims unlawful detention and lack of legal rights, while the government cites a statute against destroying property to prevent seizure.

The Verge26 July 2026 · 19:59 UTC
CuriousCats Full Story

US citizen Sam Tunick is facing charges for allegedly wiping his phone at Atlanta's Hartsfield-Jackson airport on January 24, 2025, during an interrogation about child exploitation images. Tunick reportedly provided federal agents with a fake ‘duress password’ to protect his data.12

His defense argues that the detention was unlawful, claiming agents denied him access to a lawyer and did not inform him of his legal rights. They assert that the request for his phone was made under false pretenses, as Tunick had not yet been granted permission to enter the US.7

The government is invoking a rarely-used statute that prohibits the destruction of property to prevent seizure. This legal approach raises questions about the balance between national security and individual rights, especially in a climate of increasing scrutiny at US borders. Marlon Kautz, a member of the movement, emphasized the importance of protecting private data against unconstitutional searches, stating, “we all have a right to secure our private data against unconstitutional searches. And we should — especially in a time of rising authoritarianism.”

The case highlights the heightened tensions surrounding border security and the treatment of citizens under the current administration, where entering the US has become more complicated, even for American citizens.

Key Insight
“The man, Sam Tunick, allegedly used a duress password to wipe his phone when federal agents tried to seize it at Atlanta's airport, and prosecutors are using a rarely-used statute prohibiting destruction of property to stop seizure. His lawyers argue the detention was an unlawful pretext for a fishing expedition into his connections.”
CuriousCats studied:
1
The Verge
“Sam Tunick allegedly gave federal agents a fake ‘duress password’ at the airport.”
The Verge →
Ask CuriousCats
What did Sam Tunick do at the airport?
Why are federal agents seizing phones at the border?
How does a duress password work in this case?
Are there similar legal cases involving phone seizures?
Which rights are being debated in this situation?
Become the most informed
person in the room.
Personal AI agents scanning 100,000+ sources — news, video, and social media — delivered every morning.
Download the App Go to CuriousCats.ai
🇺🇸 US🇮🇳 India🇬🇧 UK🇨🇦 Canada🇸🇬 Singapore
Liked the depth here?
Get the full internet briefed for you any time of the day.
Get CuriousCats