Tony Pua tells High Court Auditor-General's 1MDB audit was limited to company, with no investigations or inquiries allowed into Najib's personal bank accounts
Najib RazakMohamad Redzuan IdrusAhmad Husni HanadzlahTony PuaNajib Abdul RazakMuhammad Shafee Abdullah1MDBPublic Accounts Committee1Malaysia Development Berhad

Tony Pua tells High Court Auditor-General's 1MDB audit was limited to company, with no investigations or inquiries allowed into Najib's personal bank accounts

Tony Pua testified in the Kuala Lumpur High Court that the Auditor-General's audit of 1Malaysia Development Bhd (1MDB) was restricted to the company itself, prohibiting any inquiries into former Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak's personal bank accounts, as stated in the interim report.

Malaysiakini Malaysiakini+1 source6 August 2026 · 12:42 UTC
CuriousCats Full Story

Tony Pua, a former member of the Public Accounts Committee, revealed in court that the Auditor-General's audit was constrained to reviewing only 1MDB's financial statements due to a lack of cooperation from the company. He stated, "1MDB failed to provide many critical documents, including but not limited to investment agreements and bank statements of its foreign subsidiaries."124

Pua emphasized that the audit's scope was strictly limited, with no inquiries permitted into Najib's personal bank accounts. This limitation was highlighted in the Auditor-General's interim report, which led then Finance Minister II Datuk Seri Ahmad Husni Hanadzlah to dismiss allegations against 1MDB, claiming the report found "no evidence of wrongdoing".578

The testimony was part of the ongoing civil suit against Najib and six others, involving US$5.64 billion related to 1MDB. Pua's statements were crucial in understanding the constraints faced by the Auditor-General during the audit process, which has been a focal point in the broader investigation into the 1MDB scandal.

Earlier in the proceedings, the court allowed Najib's lead counsel to expunge certain parts of Pua's witness statement, which included opinions and hearsay regarding media reports on the scandal during Najib's administration. This legal maneuvering underscores the contentious nature of the trial, which has significant implications for Najib, who was sentenced to 15 years' imprisonment and fined RM11.4 billion for his role in the 1MDB scandal.

Key Insight
“Pua, a former PAC member, said the audit relied only on 1MDB's audited financial statements due to substantial lack of cooperation from the company. The court also expunged several paragraphs of his witness statement as opinion and hearsay, including references to Sarawak Report articles.”
CuriousCats studied:
1
MalaysiakiniMalaysiakini
“The Kuala Lumpur High Court today heard that the auditor-general's interim report stated that its audit was limited to 1MDB, with no investigations or inquiries allowed into former prime minister Najib Abdul Razak's personal bank accounts.”
Malaysiakini →
2
The StarThe Star
“KUALA LUMPUR: The High Court here on Thursday (Aug 6) heard that the Auditor-General's interim report stated that its audit was limited to 1Malaysia Development Bhd (1MDB), with no investigations or inquiries allowed into former prime minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak's personal bank accounts.”
The Star →
Ask CuriousCats
What did Tony Pua testify about the 1MDB audit?
How did the auditor-general's report limit its scope?
Why was cooperation from 1MDB significant?
Are there other investigations into Najib's finances?
How does this case compare to previous scandals?
Get your CIA-level briefing,
in real time.
CuriousCats monitors the internet every minute for you and brings you the most personalized brief of videos, social media posts, news and more.
Download the App
If you liked this, you’ll love your CuriousCats brief.
News, videos, opinions and more — without the noise.
Get CuriousCats