Supreme Court directs Delhi government to ensure medical treatment for Jantar Mantar protestors injured by pellet guns.
Vrinda GroverMansooriGroverSinghSupreme Court of IndiaRapid Action Force

Supreme Court directs Delhi government to ensure medical treatment for Jantar Mantar protestors injured by pellet guns.

The Supreme Court has ordered the Delhi government to provide medical treatment to protestors injured by pellet guns during a recent demonstration at Jantar Mantar, emphasizing the need for accountability and proper protocols regarding the use of such weapons by police forces.

Bar and Bench Bar and Bench+1 source30 July 2026 · 10:56 UTC
CuriousCats Full Story

The Supreme Court has mandated that the Delhi government ensure medical treatment for protestors injured by pellet guns during the Jantar Mantar demonstration. This decision follows allegations of excessive force used by the Rapid Action Force (RAF) against peaceful protestors.13

The court's interim order was issued while addressing a petition from individuals, including Sahil Lochab, a 19-year-old who suffered severe eye injuries. The petitioners argued that the use of pellet guns is an unreasonable and dangerous method for dispersing civilian assemblies, highlighting the unpredictable nature of pellet trajectories.

Justice Bagchi noted that police rules permit the use of such weapons only in exceptional circumstances, urging the establishment of a protocol for their deployment. The court emphasized that the injuries sustained by civilians during the Sansad Chalo march on July 20 warrant a public law remedy, including compensation.45

The petitioners, including Singh and Mansoori, reported being victims of the RAF's actions during the protest against exam paper leaks. The court's ruling reflects a growing concern over police conduct and the need for accountability in the use of force against demonstrators.

The RAF has initiated a verification process regarding the allegations of excessive force, with reports indicating that seven rounds of pellet guns were fired during the incident. The court's directive aims to ensure that injured individuals receive the necessary medical care and that such incidents are addressed appropriately.

Key Insight
“The Supreme Court's interim order follows allegations of excessive use of pellet guns by the Rapid Action Force during the July 20 protests, which left several civilians injured. The Court emphasized the need for a protocol regarding the use of such weapons against peaceful assemblies, highlighting the serious injuries sustained by protestors.”
CuriousCats studied:
1
Bar and BenchBar and Bench
“The Supreme Court on Thursday directed the Delhi government to ensure medical treatment is provided to the protestors at Jantar Mantar who suffered injuries from pellet guns used by police.”
Bar and Bench →
2
livelaw.inlivelaw.in
“While hearing a alleging the use of pellet guns by the Rapid Action Force against the student protests in Delhi last week, the Supreme Court on Thursday passed an interim order directing the Delhi Government to ensure that the injured petitioners and other similarly placed persons are given adequate medical treatment.”
livelaw.in →
Ask CuriousCats
What prompted the Supreme Court's interim order?
Who were the injured protestors at Jantar Mantar?
Why are pellet guns controversial in protests?
Are similar excessive force allegations common elsewhere?
How does this incident compare to past protest responses?
Become the most informed
person in the room.
Personal AI agents scanning 100,000+ sources — news, video, and social media — delivered every morning.
Download the App Go to CuriousCats.ai
🇺🇸 US🇮🇳 India🇬🇧 UK🇨🇦 Canada🇸🇬 Singapore
One story brought you here.
CuriousCats brings you everything else worth knowing.
Get CuriousCats