- The US government released its anxiously awaited plan for managing the Colorado River crisis, which includes potential cuts in water supplied to California, Arizona, and Nevada.
- Under the proposal, the lower basin states could lose up to 3 million acre-feet of water annually, enough to serve more than 25 million people.
- The federal government is expected to release a record of decision detailing operations under the plan in the coming week.
- The Arizona Department of Water Resources stated that enacting 3 million acre-feet of cuts would devastate its water users and economy.
- The Colorado River supplies water to roughly 40 million people across seven states and two countries, irrigating 5.5 million acres of farmland.
- The new plan allows for adjustments every two years based on hydrologic conditions in the system.
- California officials described the proposal as an important milestone but emphasized it is not the finish line.
- The Upper Basin states of Colorado, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming were spared from mandatory cuts for now.
The U.S. Bureau of Reclamation's new proposal aims to mitigate the Colorado River crisis by mandating significant water cuts for the lower basin states—Arizona, California, and Nevada—potentially reducing their usage by up to 3 million acre-feet annually through 2036. This reduction is equivalent to the water supply for over 25 million people.25

The plan, released on Friday, is a response to ongoing negotiations and a 20% decline in river flows over the past century, alongside a record-low snowpack affecting key reservoirs. The Arizona Department of Water Resources has criticized the proposal, stating it would devastate local water users and the economy, with director Tom Buschatzke calling it4
“The proposal spares Colorado, Utah, New Mexico and Wyoming from mandatory cuts while the lower-basin states could lose up to 3 million acre-feet a year. Arizona Representative Adelita Grijalva called the plan “unreasonable and unacceptable,” and Nevada's governor said the reductions would be unrealistic and devastating.”