- David Streever sent an email to Todd Lyons, then the acting director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, criticizing the conduct of federal agents after the shooting deaths of Alex Pretti and Renee Good in Minneapolis.
- The email compared Lyons to a former Nazi official.
- In June, special agents visited Streever's home and presented his wife with a warning notice, informing him that the email he sent months earlier was considered a threat.
- A federal judge ruled that Streever's First Amendment rights were violated and granted an injunction against ICE.
- DHS has 14 days to file an emergency appeal; if it does not, the injunction will take effect in 14 days.
- Streever filed a lawsuit in July, arguing that ICE agents violated his rights when they tried to track him down and confront him about an email to the former director of ICE.
- In a 43-page ruling, the judge said the government’s pursuit of David Streever 'practically shouts' that he could be prosecuted 'if he continues to engage in political speech.'
- Streever's attorney, Adam Steinbaugh, stated that the court's ruling indicates that the government's actions have an ongoing chilling effect on free speech.
A federal judge has ruled that David Streever's First Amendment rights were violated by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) after he sent a critical email to ICE regarding the conduct of federal agents. Streever's email, which compared ICE's acting director Todd Lyons to a Nazi official, was sent in response to the shooting deaths of Alex Pretti and Renee Good during an immigration crackdown in Minnesota.1
Streever filed a lawsuit after DHS agents visited his home, presenting his wife with a warning notice that labeled his email a threat. U.S. District Court Judge Rudolph Contreras stated, “Mr. Streever has a right to express his political views through non-threatening speech, however degrading the speech might be.” The judge emphasized that DHS likely infringed on Streever's rights by threatening prosecution for his criticism.3
The ruling, which spans 43 pages, highlighted that the government's actions had a chilling effect on Streever's political speech. “The court said, correctly, I think that the government had issued this warning notice, and this warning notice talks about future consequences for the speech,” said Streever's attorney, Steinbaugh. The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, which represents Streever, called the ruling a significant blow to ICE's efforts to retaliate against critics.
In response, a Homeland Security spokesperson denied any allegations of attempting to suppress free speech, stating, “Any allegation DHS and its components are attempting to ‘squash’ free speech is categorically FALSE.”
“The judge's 43-page ruling said the government's pursuit of Streever 'practically shouts' he could be prosecuted if he continues political speech. Streever's attorney Adam Steinbaugh warned that a systemic way of handing out forms warning people that protected speech might be a federal crime 'should scare all Americans.'”
13wham.com
