Australia’s under-16 social media ban is failing, study shows; eSafety meanwhile finds an early decline in teens’ accounts
Joanna OrlandoeSafety CommissionerAnika WellsAmerican Psychological AssociationUnited Nations Children’s FundAustralian Communications Minister

Australia’s under-16 social media ban is failing, study shows; eSafety meanwhile finds an early decline in teens’ accounts

A study by Australia’s eSafety Commissioner reveals a modest decline in social media account ownership among children under 16, dropping from 52.4% to 42.1% post-ban. However, many teens continue to circumvent restrictions, with 50.2% reporting platforms did not verify their age, raising concerns about enforcement effectiveness.

Digital Watch Observatory Digital Watch Observatory+1 source3 August 2026 · 17:43 UTC
CuriousCats Full Story

A new study by Australia’s eSafety Commissioner indicates that the country’s ban on social media for children under 16 is not fully effective. The study, part of a two-year longitudinal evaluation, surveyed 4,121 children and their parents, revealing a decline in account ownership from 52.4% to 42.1% three months after the ban's implementation on December 10, 2025.12

Despite this decline, many children continue to access social media. 50.2% of those who retained their accounts reported that platforms did not verify their age, allowing them to circumvent the ban. Joanna Orlando, a researcher in digital wellbeing, noted that tech-savvy teens often use VPNs or migrate to less regulated platforms.34

The report also highlighted that around 58% of teenagers reported using social media daily, a slight decrease from 60% before the ban. Interestingly, the proportion of children feeling that peers without social media were missing out fell from 43.3% to 36.3%, indicating a shift in social dynamics.

The Australian government implemented this ban to address rising concerns about cyberbullying and mental health issues among youth. Australian Communications Minister Anika Wells stated, “We stared down everybody who said it couldn’t be done,” emphasizing the importance of the law despite its challenges in enforcement.9

As of January 16, social media companies had revoked access to about 4.7 million accounts identified as belonging to children in Australia, but the ongoing challenge remains in ensuring compliance and effective age verification measures.

Key Insight
“eSafety’s three-month follow-up found account ownership on age-restricted platforms fell from 52.4% to 42.1%, while 50.2% of children who kept accounts said platforms never asked their age. Social media companies had revoked access to about 4.7 million accounts by mid-January, officials said; Reddit’s High Court challenge and ‘reasonable steps’ scrutiny leave the ban’s effectiveness unresolved.”
CuriousCats studied:
1
Digital Watch ObservatoryDigital Watch Observatory
“Australia’s eSafety Commissioner has , finding a modest early decline in account ownership among children under 16.”
Digital Watch Observatory →
2
Al JazeeraAl Jazeera
“A new study by Australia’s internet regulator has that more than eight in 10 young Australian teens and preteens are continuing to use social media platforms despite the government’s prohibition for children under 16.”
Al Jazeera →
Ask CuriousCats
What is Australia's under-16 social media ban?
Who conducted the study on the ban's effectiveness?
Why are children still accessing social media?
Are teens using social media more than before?
Which platforms have faced account revocations?
Get your CIA-level briefing,
in real time.
CuriousCats monitors the internet every minute for you and brings you the most personalized brief of videos, social media posts, news and more.
Download the App
One story brought you here.
CuriousCats brings you everything else worth knowing.
Get CuriousCats