George W. BushMark BennettMatt DussAbdelhalim AbdelrahmanPatrick BumatayRichard CzubaRogersMohamed MorsiGabrial SanchezAbdul El-SayedDonald TrumpHaley StevensBarack ObamaUS District CourtGlengariff GroupJustice DepartmentNinth Circuit Court of AppealsAmerican Muslims for PalestineGOPUnited States Department of Justice9th US Circuit Court of AppealsCenter for International PolicyThe HillDecision Desk HQ

Appeals court denies Trump DOJ bid to halt California mail-in ballot counting, in setback for federal election oversight push

A U.S. appeals court denied the Trump administration's request to block California from counting mail-in ballots from over 20,000 individuals the federal government claims are likely noncitizens, marking a setback for federal election oversight efforts ahead of the midterm elections.

The Guardian The Guardian+2 sources26 October 2026 · 23:33 UTC
Media in this story
CuriousCats Full Story

A U.S. appeals court ruled against the Trump administration on Monday, denying its emergency appeal to block California from counting mail-in ballots from over 20,000 individuals the federal government claims are likely noncitizens. This decision is a significant setback for federal election oversight efforts as the midterm elections approach.

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals stated that it lacked the authority to intervene before the district court had addressed the matter. Judge Mark Bennett, a Trump appointee, noted that the emergency claimed by the Justice Department was partly self-constructed, attributing delays to the government's own actions.

The Justice Department's lawsuit, filed earlier this month, sought to prevent California officials from counting these ballots, escalating tensions between the Trump administration and the state. The court's decision sends the case back to the U.S. District Court in California, where a hearing is scheduled for Tuesday at 4 p.m. ET.7

This ruling reflects ongoing disputes over voting rights and election integrity, particularly as the midterms approach, with Republicans striving to maintain control of Congress amid heightened scrutiny of mail-in voting practices.

“The United States’s claimed emergency, at least in part, is a self-constructed one,” the majority wrote, emphasizing the complexities surrounding the counting of ballots in a state with millions of registered voters.

As the political landscape evolves, this ruling could have significant implications for election oversight and the integrity of mail-in voting in California and beyond.

Key Insight
“The panel's majority wrote that the administration's claimed emergency was 'self-constructed,' citing its own delay in filing suit. The case now returns to district court, where a hearing is set for Tuesday at 4 p.m. ET.”
CuriousCats studied:
1
The GuardianThe Guardian
“A ⁠US appeals court on Monday ruled against Donald ⁠Trump’s ​justice department in a major voting dispute ahead ⁠of the midterm elections, denying a ⁠request to block California from ​counting ‌mail ballots ‌from people on a list ‌of more than the federal government alleges are likely noncitizens.”
The Guardian →
2
CNN
“A federal appeals court on Monday the Trump administration’s unprecedented attempt to force California to set aside votes from 20,000 people it claims are noncitizens.”
CNN →
3
CBS NewsCBS News
“At a Sunday rally in Michigan, Trump unleashed a volley of Islamophobic comments against El-Sayed, the Democratic nominee who is seeking to become the first Muslim senator in history.”
CBS News →
Ask CuriousCats
What was the appeal about?
Why did the court deny the DOJ's request?
Who filed the lawsuit regarding mail-in ballots?
Are other states facing similar voting challenges?
Which past cases relate to federal election oversight?
Get your CIA-level briefing,
in real time.
CuriousCats monitors the internet every minute for you and brings you the most personalized brief of videos, social media posts, news and more.
Download the App
One story brought you here.
CuriousCats brings you everything else worth knowing.
Get CuriousCats