Top Court warns against use of AI in Legal Process; global push for AI governance amid warnings of catastrophic harm
Yoshua BengioEgriselda LópezRein TammsaarMaria RessaEssel InfraprojectsNational Company Law TribunalUnited Nations

Top Court warns against use of AI in Legal Process; global push for AI governance amid warnings of catastrophic harm

The Supreme Court has raised alarms over the use of artificial intelligence in legal proceedings, citing a case where the National Company Law Tribunal relied on fabricated precedents. Experts warn that while AI holds potential benefits, it also poses risks of catastrophic harm if not properly governed.

NDTV+1 source45 min ago
CuriousCats Full Story

The Supreme Court's recent ruling highlights the dangers of AI in legal contexts, emphasizing the necessity for human oversight.1

The court criticized the National Company Law Tribunal for relying on non-existent precedents generated by AI, stating that human control over adjudication must remain total and absolute.23

Experts like Yoshua Bengio warn that AI's rapid evolution outpaces regulatory frameworks, raising concerns about catastrophic harm from deceptive AI behavior.46

Maria Ressa describes the situation as an ‘information Armageddon’, where misinformation can undermine democracy.7

The global dialogue on AI governance is crucial, as developing countries fear being left behind in the AI divide, according to Egriselda López.

The call for a multilateral solution to AI governance is echoed by Ressa, stressing that no single nation can tackle this challenge alone.

As AI continues to evolve, the need for comprehensive governance becomes increasingly urgent, with the potential for both transformational benefits and significant risks looming large.5

Key Insight
“The Supreme Court set aside an NCLT verdict on Essel Infraprojects insolvency after finding the tribunal relied on nonexistent, fake AI-generated precedents. At the UN Global Dialogue, Maria Ressa warned that AI threatens information integrity, calling it an ‘information Armageddon’ and urging a multilateral solution.”
CuriousCats studied:
1
NDTV
“The Supreme Court on Thursday expressed grave concern over a National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) judgment which relied on fake precedents and cases generated using Artificial Intelligence (AI).”
NDTV →
2
Daily PioneerDaily Pioneer
“Can artificial intelligence benefit all of humanity – safely, fairly and without causing “catastrophic harm”?”
Daily Pioneer →
Ask CuriousCats
What prompted the Supreme Court's decision?
How did AI influence the NCLT verdict?
Why is AI governance being discussed globally?
Are there similar warnings from other nations?
How does current AI regulation differ globally?
Become the most informed
person in the room.
Personal AI agents scanning 100,000+ sources — news, video, and social media — delivered every morning.
Download the App Go to CuriousCats.ai
🇺🇸 US🇮🇳 India🇬🇧 UK🇨🇦 Canada🇸🇬 Singapore
One story brought you here.
CuriousCats brings you everything else worth knowing.
Get CuriousCats